What Has Gone Wrong at Zipcar – and the UK Car-Sharing Market Finished?

The volunteer food project in Rotherhithe has provided hundreds of cooked meals weekly for two years to elderly residents and needy locals in southeast London. However, the group's plans face major disruption by the announcement that they will not have access to New Year’s Day.

The group had relied on Zipcar, the car-sharing company that allowed its cars from the street. It caused shock across London when it declared it would cease its UK operations from 1 January.

This means many helpers will be unable to collect food from a major food charity, that collects surplus food from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Obvious alternatives are less convenient, costlier, or lack the same convenient access.

“The impact will be massively,” said Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “My team and I are concerned by the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours will face difficulties.”

“Faced with this reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Significant Setback for City Vehicle Clubs

The community kitchen’s drivers are among more than half a million people in London registered as car club members, now potentially left without easy use to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. Most of those people were likely with Zipcar, which had a near-monopoly position in the city.

The planned closure, pending consultation with staff, is a serious setback to hopes that vehicle clubs in cities could reduce the need for owning a car. Yet, some analysts also suggested that Zipcar’s exit need not mean the demise for the idea in Britain.

The Potential of Car Sharing

Shared vehicle use is prized by many urbanists and green advocates as a way of mitigating the ills associated with vehicle ownership. Most cars sit idle on the side of the road for the vast majority of the time, using up space. They also require large CO2 output to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to use active travel and take public transport more. That benefits cities – reducing congestion and pollution – and improves public health through more exercise.

Understanding the Decline

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the US car rental group Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK income were minimal compared with its parent company's total earnings, and a deficit that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave little incentive to continue.

Avis Budget has said the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our global operations, where we are taking deliberate steps to simplify processes, improve returns”.

Its latest financial reports noted revenues had fallen as drivers took fewer and shorter trips. “This trend reflect the continuing effect of the cost-of-living crisis, which is dampening demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

London's Unique Hurdles

However, several experts noted that London has specific problems that made it difficult for the company and its rivals to succeed.

  • Patchwork Policies: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a patchwork of different procedures and costs that made it harder.
  • Congestion Charge: The closure coincides with electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding extra expenses.
  • Parking Permit Disparity: Residents in some boroughs pay just £63 for a annual electric car parking permit. A floating car club would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a major disincentive.

“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We’re taking cars off the street. We introduce cleaner models in their place.”

Lessons from Abroad

Nations in Europe offer examples for London to follow. Germany introduced national car-sharing legislation in 2017, providing a nationwide framework for parking, support and exemptions. Now, the country has several shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK trails at 0.7.

“What we see is that car sharing around the world, especially in Europe, is expanding,” commented Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

Devanathan said authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of mass transit, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was already seriously considering entering the London market: “Operators will fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can roughly be divided into two camps:

  1. Fleet Operators: Which own or lease their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Person-to-Person Rentals: Which allow users to rent out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Examples Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

Turo, a US-headquartered P2P service, is assessing the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “There is a void that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take a while for other players to establish themselves. For now, more people may choose to buy cars, and many across London will be without a convenient option.

For Rotherhithe community kitchen, the next month will be a rush to find a way. The delivery problem caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the wider implications of its departure on community groups and the prospects of car-sharing in the UK.

Marilyn White
Marilyn White

Klara is a linguist and writer passionate about exploring the nuances of language and storytelling in modern literature.